Reasons to choose Caplio 400G Wide
Released in 2003, Caplio 400G Wide has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 355 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh Caplio 400G Wide
vs Ricoh Caplio RR230
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Caplio 400G Wide15 mm²
Caplio RR230- Area ratio
- 1.41:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 40.6%
The Caplio 400G Wide has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Caplio 400G WideMetricCaplio RR230
3.34 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.53 µmPixel pitch2.68 µm
6.38 µm²Pixel area7.19 µm²
15.67 MP/cm²Pixel density13.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
355 gWeight220 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AA, Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Caplio 400G Wide has the larger sensor area. The Caplio RR230 has the lighter body. The Caplio 400G Wide has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio 400G Wide and Caplio RR230 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Caplio RR230
Released in 2003, Caplio RR230 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.