Reasons to choose DC Slim 2
Released in 2004, DC Slim 2 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica DC Slim 2
vs Samsung Digimax 101
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DC Slim 231 mm²
Digimax 101- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC Slim 2 and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DC Slim 2MetricDigimax 101
2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight125 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC Slim 2 and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. The DC Slim 2 has the lighter body. The DC Slim 2 has the higher effective resolution. The DC Slim 2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digimax 101
Released in 2002, Digimax 101 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.