CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax K-m
vs Pentax K100D

Archive illustration for Pentax K-m

Pentax / 2008

K-m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax K100D

Pentax / 2006

K100D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
K-m
369 mm²
K100D
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The K-m and K100D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

K-mMetricK100D
10.2 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
6.01 µmPixel pitch7.78 µm
36.17 µm²Pixel area60.48 µm²
2.76 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
590 gWeight560 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2 x AA Alkaline, Lithium or NiMH BatteriesBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The K-m and K100D have the same sensor area. The K100D has the lighter body. The K-m has the higher effective resolution. The K-m is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose K-m

Released in 2008, K-m has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 590 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose K100D

Released in 2006, K100D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 560 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras