Reasons to choose TG-320
Released in 2012, TG-320 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus TG-320
vs Olympus VG-160
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
TG-32028 mm²
VG-160- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The TG-320 and VG-160 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
TG-320MetricVG-160
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight125 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC
Lithium-ion rechargeable LI-42B battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion rechargeable LI-70B battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The TG-320 and VG-160 have the same sensor area. The VG-160 has the lighter body. The TG-320 and VG-160 have the same effective resolution. The TG-320 and VG-160 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose VG-160
Released in 2012, VG-160 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.