CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus SH-50 iHS
vs Olympus Tough TG-3

Archive illustration for Olympus SH-50 iHS

Olympus / 2013

SH-50 iHS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus Tough TG-3

Olympus / 2014

Tough TG-3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
SH-50 iHS
28 mm²
Tough TG-3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The SH-50 iHS and Tough TG-3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

SH-50 iHSMetricTough TG-3
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
269 gWeight247 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LI-90B Lithium-Ion Battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion Rechargeable Battery (LI-92B) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SH-50 iHS and Tough TG-3 have the same sensor area. The Tough TG-3 has the lighter body. The SH-50 iHS and Tough TG-3 have the same effective resolution. The Tough TG-3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose SH-50 iHS

Released in 2013, SH-50 iHS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 269 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Tough TG-3

Released in 2014, Tough TG-3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 247 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras