Reasons to choose Mju 5000
Released in 2009, Mju 5000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.7 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus Mju 5000
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT3
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Mju 500028 mm²
Lumix DMC-FT3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Mju 5000 and Lumix DMC-FT3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Mju 5000MetricLumix DMC-FT3
12.7 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.48 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.18 µm²Pixel area2.29 µm²
45.81 MP/cm²Pixel density43.64 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight197 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Mju 5000 and Lumix DMC-FT3 have the same sensor area. The Mju 5000 has the lighter body. The Mju 5000 has the higher effective resolution. The Lumix DMC-FT3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FT3
Released in 2011, Lumix DMC-FT3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 197 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.