Reasons to choose D-200L
Released in 1996, D-200L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus D-200L
vs Olympus D-300L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
D-200L58 mm²
D-300L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The D-200L and D-300L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
D-200LMetricD-300L
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.8 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
13.91 µmPixel pitch8.52 µm
193.6 µm²Pixel area72.6 µm²
0.52 MP/cm²Pixel density1.38 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight320 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The D-200L and D-300L have the same sensor area. The D-200L and D-300L have the same body weight. The D-300L has the higher effective resolution. The D-200L and D-300L were both released in 1996. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose D-300L
Released in 1996, D-300L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.