Reasons to choose E2n
Released in 1997, E2n has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon E2n
vs Olympus C-1400L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
E2n58 mm²
C-1400L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E2n and C-1400L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
E2nMetricC-1400L
1.4 MPEffective pixels1.4 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.44 µmPixel pitch6.44 µm
41.49 µm²Pixel area41.49 µm²
2.41 MP/cm²Pixel density2.41 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
—Weight560 g
—StorageSmartMedia
NiMH accuBattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E2n and C-1400L have the same sensor area. The E2n has the lighter body. The E2n and C-1400L have the same effective resolution. The E2n and C-1400L were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose C-1400L
Released in 1997, C-1400L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 560 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.