CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D2X
vs Sigma SD9

Archive illustration for Nikon D2X

Nikon / 2004

D2X

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma SD9

Sigma / 2002

SD9

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

372 mm²
D2X
286 mm²
SD9
Area ratio
1.3:1
Absolute difference
86 mm²
Relative difference
30.3%

The D2X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D2XMetricSD9
12.2 MPEffective pixels3.4 MP
23.7 × 15.7Sensor20.7 × 13.8
5.52 µmPixel pitch9.17 µm
30.5 µm²Pixel area84.02 µm²
3.28 MP/cm²Pixel density1.19 MP/cm²
1.52Crop factor1.74
—Maximum video—
1,200 gWeight803 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Nikon EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D2X has the larger sensor area. The SD9 has the lighter body. The D2X has the higher effective resolution. The D2X is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D2X

Released in 2004, D2X has about 372 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SD9

Released in 2002, SD9 has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 3.4 MP effective resolution, and a 803 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras