CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox Classic Leica M3 2.1
vs Minox DD1

Archive illustration for Minox Classic Leica M3 2.1

Minox / 2003

Classic Leica M3 2.1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DD1

Minox / 2003

DD1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Classic Leica M3 2.1
31 mm²
DD1
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Classic Leica M3 2.1 and DD1 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Classic Leica M3 2.1MetricDD1
2 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area14.63 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density6.84 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
98 gWeight120 g
—Storage—
1x CR2 LithiumBattery1x CR2 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Classic Leica M3 2.1 and DD1 have the same sensor area. The Classic Leica M3 2.1 has the lighter body. The DD1 has the higher effective resolution. The Classic Leica M3 2.1 and DD1 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Classic Leica M3 2.1

Released in 2003, Classic Leica M3 2.1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DD1

Released in 2003, DD1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras