Reasons to choose DG-2
Released in 2001, DG-2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 425 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-2
vs Konica Revio KD-25
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-238 mm²
Revio KD-25- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The Revio KD-25 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DG-2MetricRevio KD-25
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.18 µmPixel pitch4.25 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area18.05 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density5.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
425 gWeight140 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-25 has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-25 has the lighter body. The DG-2 has the higher effective resolution. The DG-2 and Revio KD-25 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-25
Released in 2001, Revio KD-25 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.