Reasons to choose EasyShare Z981
Released in 2010, EasyShare Z981 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 519 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare Z981
vs Kodak Slice
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare Z98128 mm²
Slice- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Slice has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare Z981MetricSlice
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
519 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
AA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Slice has the larger sensor area. The Slice has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z981 and Slice have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare Z981 and Slice were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Slice
Released in 2010, Slice has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.