Reasons to choose EasyShare M215
Released in 2012, EasyShare M215 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M215
vs Kodak EasyShare M565
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
EasyShare M21528 mm²
EasyShare M565- Area ratio
- 1.65:1
- Absolute difference
- 11 mm²
- Relative difference
- 64.7%
The EasyShare M565 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M215MetricEasyShare M565
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.11 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.23 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
81.02 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
—Storage—
—Battery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M565 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M215 and EasyShare M565 have the same body weight. The EasyShare M215 and EasyShare M565 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare M215 and EasyShare M565 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M565
Released in 2012, EasyShare M565 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.