Reasons to choose EasyShare CD80
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD80 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CD80
vs Kodak EasyShare M1033
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare CD8028 mm²
EasyShare M1033- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare M1033 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CD80MetricEasyShare M1033
10 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.68 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.82 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.49 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight166 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
2x AABatteryKodak KLIC-7004 Lithium-Ion, Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CD80 and EasyShare M1033 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare CD80 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M1033 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD80 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M1033
Released in 2008, EasyShare M1033 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 166 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.