Reasons to choose EasyShare C135
Released in 2012, EasyShare C135 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C135
vs Kodak EasyShare M215
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare C13517 mm²
EasyShare M215- Area ratio
- 1.65:1
- Absolute difference
- 11 mm²
- Relative difference
- 64.7%
The EasyShare C135 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C135MetricEasyShare M215
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor4.8 × 3.6
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.11 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.23 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density81.02 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorage—
2 x AA batteries alkaline, lithium, or Ni-MHBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare C135 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare M215 has the lighter body. The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M215 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare C135 and EasyShare M215 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M215
Released in 2012, EasyShare M215 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.