Reasons to choose DCS620x
Released in 2000, DCS620x has about 353 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,580 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DCS620x
vs Kodak DCS760
VS
Sensor area
353 mm²
DCS620x510 mm²
DCS760- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 156 mm²
- Relative difference
- 44.2%
The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DCS620xMetricDCS760
2 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
22.8 × 15.5Sensor27.65 × 18.43
13.29 µmPixel pitch9.14 µm
176.7 µm²Pixel area83.54 µm²
0.57 MP/cm²Pixel density1.2 MP/cm²
1.57Crop factor1.3
—Maximum video—
1,580 gWeight1,860 g
PCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)StoragePCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)
Kodak NiCD / NiMHBatteryKodak NiMH
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. The DCS620x has the lighter body. The DCS760 has the higher effective resolution. The DCS760 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCS760
Released in 2001, DCS760 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,860 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.