Reasons to choose DCS Pro 14n
Released in 2002, DCS Pro 14n has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 13.7 MP effective resolution, and a 1,000 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DCS Pro 14n
vs Kodak DCS760
VS
Sensor area
864 mm²
DCS Pro 14n510 mm²
DCS760- Area ratio
- 1.7:1
- Absolute difference
- 354 mm²
- Relative difference
- 69.5%
The DCS Pro 14n has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DCS Pro 14nMetricDCS760
13.7 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
36 × 24Sensor27.65 × 18.43
7.94 µmPixel pitch9.14 µm
63.07 µm²Pixel area83.54 µm²
1.59 MP/cm²Pixel density1.2 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1.3
—Maximum video—
1,000 gWeight1,860 g
Compact Flash Type I/II, SD/MMC cardStoragePCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)
Kodak Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryKodak NiMH
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCS Pro 14n has the larger sensor area. The DCS Pro 14n has the lighter body. The DCS Pro 14n has the higher effective resolution. The DCS Pro 14n is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCS760
Released in 2001, DCS760 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,860 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.