Reasons to choose JD 8.0z3 EasyShot
Released in 2008, JD 8.0z3 EasyShot has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 8.0z3 EasyShot
vs Olympus SP 320
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
JD 8.0z3 EasyShot38 mm²
SP 320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot and SP 320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
JD 8.0z3 EasyShotMetricSP 320
8 MPEffective pixels7.41 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.26 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area5.11 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density19.55 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot and SP 320 have the same sensor area. The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot has the lighter body. The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot has the higher effective resolution. The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose SP 320
Released in 2006, SP 320 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 7.41 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.