Reasons to choose Photosmart M737
Released in 2007, Photosmart M737 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart M737
vs HP Photosmart Mz67
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Photosmart M73738 mm²
Photosmart Mz67- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The Photosmart Mz67 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Photosmart M737MetricPhotosmart Mz67
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.76 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
—Weight227 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart Mz67 has the larger sensor area. The Photosmart M737 has the lighter body. The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart Mz67 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart Mz67 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart Mz67
Released in 2007, Photosmart Mz67 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.