Reasons to choose Photosmart C200
Released in 1999, Photosmart C200 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart C200
vs Olympus D-340L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
Photosmart C20058 mm²
D-340L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart C200 and D-340L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart C200MetricD-340L
1 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
7.62 µmPixel pitch6.96 µm
58.08 µm²Pixel area48.4 µm²
1.72 MP/cm²Pixel density2.07 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight320 g
Compact FlashStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart C200 and D-340L have the same sensor area. The Photosmart C200 has the lighter body. The D-340L has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart C200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose D-340L
Released in 1998, D-340L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.