Reasons to choose Photosmart 812
Released in 2002, Photosmart 812 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart 812
vs HP Photosmart 935
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Photosmart 81238 mm²
Photosmart 935- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart 812 and Photosmart 935 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart 812MetricPhotosmart 935
4.1 MPEffective pixels5.24 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.04 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
9.24 µm²Pixel area7.23 µm²
10.82 MP/cm²Pixel density13.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight260 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart 812 and Photosmart 935 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart 812 has the lighter body. The Photosmart 935 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart 935 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart 935
Released in 2003, Photosmart 935 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.24 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.