Reasons to choose E1035
Released in 2008, E1035 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.54 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE E1035
vs GE E1040
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
E103542 mm²
E1040- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E1035 and E1040 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
E1035MetricE1040
10.54 MPEffective pixels10.54 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
2.01 µmPixel pitch2.01 µm
4.03 µm²Pixel area4.03 µm²
24.82 MP/cm²Pixel density24.82 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight150 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E1035 and E1040 have the same sensor area. The E1035 has the lighter body. The E1035 and E1040 have the same effective resolution. The E1035 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E1040
Released in 2007, E1040 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.54 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.