Reasons to choose DS-260HD
Released in 1999, DS-260HD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 700 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm DS-260HD
vs Minolta DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DS-260HD31 mm²
DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DS-260HD and DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DS-260HDMetricDiMAGE EX 1500 Wide
1.3 MPEffective pixels1.4 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.68 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area21.94 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density4.56 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
700 gWeight350 g
SmartMediaStorageCompact Flash
Lithium-Ion (NP-100) Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DS-260HD and DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide has the lighter body. The DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide has the higher effective resolution. The DS-260HD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide
Released in 1998, DiMAGE EX 1500 Wide has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.