CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Fujifilm Bigjob HD-3W
vs Sanyo VPC E890

Archive illustration for Fujifilm Bigjob HD-3W

Fujifilm / 2007

Bigjob HD-3W

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC E890

Sanyo / 2009

VPC E890

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Bigjob HD-3W
25 mm²
VPC E890
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Bigjob HD-3W and VPC E890 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Bigjob HD-3WMetricVPC E890
6 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
385 gWeight—
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Bigjob HD-3W and VPC E890 have the same sensor area. The VPC E890 has the lighter body. The VPC E890 has the higher effective resolution. The VPC E890 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Bigjob HD-3W

Released in 2007, Bigjob HD-3W has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 385 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VPC E890

Released in 2009, VPC E890 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras