Reasons to choose PhotoPC 650
Released in 1999, PhotoPC 650 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Epson PhotoPC 650
vs Konica Q-M100
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
PhotoPC 65017 mm²
Q-M100- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PhotoPC 650 and Q-M100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PhotoPC 650MetricQ-M100
0.9 MPEffective pixels1.08 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
4.38 µmPixel pitch4 µm
19.2 µm²Pixel area16 µm²
5.21 MP/cm²Pixel density6.25 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight380 g
Compact Flash Type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PhotoPC 650 and Q-M100 have the same sensor area. The Q-M100 has the lighter body. The Q-M100 has the higher effective resolution. The PhotoPC 650 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Q-M100
Released in 1998, Q-M100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.08 MP effective resolution, and a 380 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.