Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go LCD
Released in 2003, Eye-Q Go LCD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q Go LCD
vs Concord Eye-Q Go Wireless
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q Go LCD38 mm²
Eye-Q Go Wireless- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Eye-Q Go Wireless has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q Go LCDMetricEye-Q Go Wireless
1.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight105 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR123 LithiumBattery1x CR123 Lithium
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q Go Wireless has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q Go Wireless has the lighter body. The Eye-Q Go Wireless has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q Go LCD and Eye-Q Go Wireless were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go Wireless
Released in 2003, Eye-Q Go Wireless has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.