Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4342z
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4342z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 196 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 4342z
vs Concord Eye-Q Go Wireless
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4342z38 mm²
Eye-Q Go Wireless- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q Go Wireless have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 4342zMetricEye-Q Go Wireless
4 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
196 gWeight105 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR123 Lithium
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q Go Wireless have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q Go Wireless has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4342z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q Go Wireless were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go Wireless
Released in 2003, Eye-Q Go Wireless has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.