Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3120 AF
Released in 2002, Eye-Q 3120 AF has about 12 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3120 AF
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ3
VS
Sensor area
12 mm²
Eye-Q 3120 AF15 mm²
Lumix DMC-FZ3- Area ratio
- 1.26:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 26.4%
The Lumix DMC-FZ3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3120 AFMetricLumix DMC-FZ3
2.1 MPEffective pixels3 MP
4 × 3Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.39 µmPixel pitch2.25 µm
5.71 µm²Pixel area5.05 µm²
17.5 MP/cm²Pixel density19.78 MP/cm²
8.65Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight290 g
SmartMediaStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Lumix DMC-FZ3 has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 3120 AF has the lighter body. The Lumix DMC-FZ3 has the higher effective resolution. The Lumix DMC-FZ3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FZ3
Released in 2004, Lumix DMC-FZ3 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 3 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.