Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3040AF
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 3040AF has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3040AF
vs Concord Eye-Q 4060AF
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q 3040AF38 mm²
Eye-Q 4060AF- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The Eye-Q 4060AF has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3040AFMetricEye-Q 4060AF
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight118 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 4060AF has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 3040AF has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4060AF has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3040AF and Eye-Q 4060AF were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4060AF
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4060AF has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.