Reasons to choose GV-10
Released in 2001, GV-10 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio GV-10
vs Casio QV-2400UX
VS
Sensor area
15 mm²
GV-1021 mm²
QV-2400UX- Area ratio
- 1.41:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 40.6%
The QV-2400UX has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
GV-10MetricQV-2400UX
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
3.55 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
12.64 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
7.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight245 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-2400UX has the larger sensor area. The QV-2400UX has the lighter body. The QV-2400UX has the higher effective resolution. The GV-10 and QV-2400UX were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-2400UX
Released in 2001, QV-2400UX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.