Reasons to choose EOS R3
Released in 2021, EOS R3 has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,015 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS R3
vs Sigma fp L
VS
Sensor area
864 mm²
EOS R3864 mm²
fp L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EOS R3 and fp L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EOS R3Metricfp L
24.1 MPEffective pixels61 MP
36 × 24Sensor36 × 24
5.99 µmPixel pitch3.76 µm
35.85 µm²Pixel area14.16 µm²
2.79 MP/cm²Pixel density7.06 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
6,000 × 3,164Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
1,015 gWeight427 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC/UHS-II/CFexpress Type BStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable Li-ion Battery LP-E19 Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-51 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS R3 and fp L have the same sensor area. The fp L has the lighter body. The fp L has the higher effective resolution. The EOS R3 and fp L were both released in 2021. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose fp L
Released in 2021, fp L has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 61 MP effective resolution, and a 427 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.