Reasons to choose EOS M200
Released in 2019, EOS M200 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 299 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS M200
vs Fujifilm X-Pro3
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS M200367 mm²
X-Pro3- Area ratio
- 1.1:1
- Absolute difference
- 34 mm²
- Relative difference
- 10.3%
The X-Pro3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EOS M200MetricX-Pro3
24.1 MPEffective pixels26.1 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.75 µm
13.79 µm²Pixel area14.05 µm²
7.25 MP/cm²Pixel density7.12 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video4,096 × 2,160
299 gWeight497 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-Pro3 has the larger sensor area. The EOS M200 has the lighter body. The X-Pro3 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M200 and X-Pro3 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-Pro3
Released in 2019, X-Pro3 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 497 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.