Reasons to choose EOS M200
Released in 2019, EOS M200 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 299 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS M200
vs Canon EOS M6 Mark II
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS M200332 mm²
EOS M6 Mark II- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EOS M200 and EOS M6 Mark II have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EOS M200MetricEOS M6 Mark II
24.1 MPEffective pixels32.5 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor22.3 × 14.9
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.2 µm
13.79 µm²Pixel area10.22 µm²
7.25 MP/cm²Pixel density9.78 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.61
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
299 gWeight408 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLP-E17 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS M200 and EOS M6 Mark II have the same sensor area. The EOS M200 has the lighter body. The EOS M6 Mark II has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M200 and EOS M6 Mark II were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EOS M6 Mark II
Released in 2019, EOS M6 Mark II has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 32.5 MP effective resolution, and a 408 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.