Reasons to choose EOS 4000D
Released in 2018, EOS 4000D has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 436 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS 4000D
vs Canon EOS M50
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS 4000D332 mm²
EOS M50- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EOS 4000D and EOS M50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EOS 4000DMetricEOS M50
18 MPEffective pixels24.1 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor22.3 × 14.9
4.3 µmPixel pitch3.71 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area13.79 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density7.25 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.61
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
436 gWeight387 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-ion Battery LP-E10 Li-ion batteryBatteryLP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS 4000D and EOS M50 have the same sensor area. The EOS M50 has the lighter body. The EOS M50 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS 4000D and EOS M50 were both released in 2018. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EOS M50
Released in 2018, EOS M50 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 387 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.