Reasons to choose DC E1050t
Released in 2008, DC E1050t has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E1050t
vs BenQ DC E800
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
DC E1050t25 mm²
DC E800- Area ratio
- 1.15:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 14.6%
The DC E1050t has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC E1050tMetricDC E800
10 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E1050t has the larger sensor area. The DC E1050t and DC E800 have the same body weight. The DC E1050t has the higher effective resolution. The DC E1050t and DC E800 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E800
Released in 2008, DC E800 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.