Reasons to choose Optima 830UW
Released in 2009, Optima 830UW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 158 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 830UW
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 8328m
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Optima 830UW25 mm²
Optima 8328m- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 830UW and Optima 8328m have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 830UWMetricOptima 8328m
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
158 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 830UW and Optima 8328m have the same sensor area. The Optima 8328m has the lighter body. The Optima 830UW and Optima 8328m have the same effective resolution. The Optima 830UW and Optima 8328m were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 8328m
Released in 2009, Optima 8328m has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.