Reasons to choose Optima 1338mT
Released in 2009, Optima 1338mT has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 1338mT
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 1438m
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 1338mT28 mm²
Optima 1438m- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Optima 1338mT has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Optima 1338mTMetricOptima 1438m
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 1338mT has the larger sensor area. The Optima 1338mT and Optima 1438m have the same body weight. The Optima 1338mT and Optima 1438m have the same effective resolution. The Optima 1338mT and Optima 1438m were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 1438m
Released in 2009, Optima 1438m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.