Reasons to choose Optima 100
Released in 2009, Optima 100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 100
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 102
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10028 mm²
Optima 102- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 100 and Optima 102 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 100MetricOptima 102
10 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight105 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 100 and Optima 102 have the same sensor area. The Optima 100 and Optima 102 have the same body weight. The Optima 102 has the higher effective resolution. The Optima 100 and Optima 102 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 102
Released in 2009, Optima 102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.