CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto ePhoto 1280
vs Olympus C-1000L

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto ePhoto 1280

AgfaPhoto / 1997

ePhoto 1280

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-1000L

Olympus / 1998

C-1000L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ePhoto 1280
31 mm²
C-1000L
Area ratio
1.08:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
7.9%

The C-1000L has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ePhoto 1280MetricC-1000L
0.7 MPEffective pixels0.85 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.4 × 4.8
6.38 µmPixel pitch6.01 µm
40.66 µm²Pixel area36.14 µm²
2.46 MP/cm²Pixel density2.77 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
420 gWeight560 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)Battery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-1000L has the larger sensor area. The ePhoto 1280 has the lighter body. The C-1000L has the higher effective resolution. The C-1000L is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ePhoto 1280

Released in 1997, ePhoto 1280 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 0.7 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-1000L

Released in 1998, C-1000L has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 0.85 MP effective resolution, and a 560 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras