CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sony Mavica CD500
vs Sony Mavica FD-75

Archive illustration for Sony Mavica CD500

Sony / 2003

Mavica CD500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Mavica FD-75

Sony / 2001

Mavica FD-75

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Mavica CD500
38 mm²
Mavica FD-75
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mavica CD500 and Mavica FD-75 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mavica CD500MetricMavica FD-75
5 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.75 µmPixel pitch11.24 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area126.32 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density0.79 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
606 gWeight580 g
8cm CDR, 8cm CDRWStorageDisk 3.5" (2x speed)
InfoLithium (NP-FM50)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-FM50)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mavica CD500 and Mavica FD-75 have the same sensor area. The Mavica FD-75 has the lighter body. The Mavica CD500 has the higher effective resolution. The Mavica CD500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mavica CD500

Released in 2003, Mavica CD500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 606 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mavica FD-75

Released in 2001, Mavica FD-75 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 580 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras