Reasons to choose Mavica CD1000
Released in 2000, Mavica CD1000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 980 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Sony Mavica CD1000
vs Sony Mavica FD-200
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Mavica CD100021 mm²
Mavica FD-200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica FD-200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Mavica CD1000MetricMavica FD-200
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
980 gWeight520 g
8cm CDRStorageDisk 3.5" (2x speed) or MemoryStick (slot)
InfoLithium (NP-F330)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-F330)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica FD-200 have the same sensor area. The Mavica FD-200 has the lighter body. The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica FD-200 have the same effective resolution. The Mavica FD-200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Mavica FD-200
Released in 2002, Mavica FD-200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 520 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.