Reasons to choose Alpha a6300
Released in 2016, Alpha a6300 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 404 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Sony Alpha a6300
vs Sony Alpha SLT-A68
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
Alpha a6300367 mm²
Alpha SLT-A68- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Alpha a6300 and Alpha SLT-A68 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Alpha a6300MetricAlpha SLT-A68
24.2 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.89 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
15.15 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
6.6 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
404 gWeight610 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO DuoStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
NP-FW50 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-FM500H lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Alpha a6300 and Alpha SLT-A68 have the same sensor area. The Alpha a6300 has the lighter body. The Alpha a6300 and Alpha SLT-A68 have the same effective resolution. The Alpha a6300 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Alpha SLT-A68
Released in 2015, Alpha SLT-A68 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 610 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.