CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sanyo Xacti DMX-CG9
vs Sanyo Xacti VPC-E10

Archive illustration for Sanyo Xacti DMX-CG9

Sanyo / 2008

Xacti DMX-CG9

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo Xacti VPC-E10

Sanyo / 2008

Xacti VPC-E10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Xacti DMX-CG9
28 mm²
Xacti VPC-E10
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The Xacti VPC-E10 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Xacti DMX-CG9MetricXacti VPC-E10
9.12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.74 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
3.04 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
32.89 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight135 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Xacti VPC-E10 has the larger sensor area. The Xacti VPC-E10 has the lighter body. The Xacti VPC-E10 has the higher effective resolution. The Xacti DMX-CG9 and Xacti VPC-E10 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Xacti DMX-CG9

Released in 2008, Xacti DMX-CG9 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9.12 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Xacti VPC-E10

Released in 2008, Xacti VPC-E10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras