CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sanyo VPC E890
vs Sanyo Xacti VPC-HD2000

Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC E890

Sanyo / 2009

VPC E890

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo Xacti VPC-HD2000

Sanyo / 2009

Xacti VPC-HD2000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
VPC E890
25 mm²
Xacti VPC-HD2000
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The VPC E890 and Xacti VPC-HD2000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

VPC E890MetricXacti VPC-HD2000
8.1 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.75 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
3.07 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
32.61 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight268 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The VPC E890 and Xacti VPC-HD2000 have the same sensor area. The VPC E890 has the lighter body. The VPC E890 and Xacti VPC-HD2000 have the same effective resolution. The VPC E890 and Xacti VPC-HD2000 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose VPC E890

Released in 2009, VPC E890 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Xacti VPC-HD2000

Released in 2009, Xacti VPC-HD2000 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 268 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras