CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sanyo VPC E1090
vs Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10

Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC E1090

Sanyo / 2009

VPC E1090

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG10

Sanyo / 2009

Xacti VPC-CG10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
VPC E1090
28 mm²
Xacti VPC-CG10
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The VPC E1090 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

VPC E1090MetricXacti VPC-CG10
10 MPEffective pixels10.66 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.61 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.6 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density38.45 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight171 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The VPC E1090 has the larger sensor area. The VPC E1090 has the lighter body. The Xacti VPC-CG10 has the higher effective resolution. The VPC E1090 and Xacti VPC-CG10 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose VPC E1090

Released in 2009, VPC E1090 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Xacti VPC-CG10

Released in 2009, Xacti VPC-CG10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.66 MP effective resolution, and a 171 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras