Reasons to choose WB2100
Released in 2013, WB2100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.38 MP effective resolution, and a 533 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung WB2100
vs Samsung WB800F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
WB210028 mm²
WB800F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The WB2100 and WB800F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
WB2100MetricWB800F
16.38 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.32 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.74 µm²Pixel area1.75 µm²
57.56 MP/cm²Pixel density57.27 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
533 gWeight218 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
SLB-10ABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The WB2100 and WB800F have the same sensor area. The WB800F has the lighter body. The WB2100 has the higher effective resolution. The WB2100 and WB800F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB800F
Released in 2013, WB800F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 218 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.