Reasons to choose ST150F
Released in 2013, ST150F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ST150F
vs Samsung WB800F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ST150F28 mm²
WB800F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ST150F and WB800F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ST150FMetricWB800F
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.75 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density57.27 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight218 g
microSD/microSDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
BP70ABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ST150F and WB800F have the same sensor area. The ST150F has the lighter body. The WB800F has the higher effective resolution. The ST150F and WB800F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB800F
Released in 2013, WB800F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 218 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.