CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung L200
vs Samsung SL50

Archive illustration for Samsung L200

Samsung / 2008

L200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung SL50

Samsung / 2010

SL50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
L200
28 mm²
SL50
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The SL50 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

L200MetricSL50
10.2 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.56 µmPixel pitch1.65 µm
2.44 µm²Pixel area2.72 µm²
41.06 MP/cm²Pixel density36.79 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight—
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SL50 has the larger sensor area. The SL50 has the lighter body. The L200 and SL50 have the same effective resolution. The SL50 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose L200

Released in 2008, L200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SL50

Released in 2010, SL50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras