Reasons to choose HZ35W
Released in 2010, HZ35W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung HZ35W
vs Samsung WB210
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
HZ35W28 mm²
WB210- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The HZ35W and WB210 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
HZ35WMetricWB210
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight174 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion SLB-11A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The HZ35W and WB210 have the same sensor area. The WB210 has the lighter body. The WB210 has the higher effective resolution. The WB210 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB210
Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.