Reasons to choose Digimax 202
Released in 2004, Digimax 202 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung Digimax 202
vs Yakumo Mega Image XS
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Digimax 20231 mm²
Mega Image XS- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Digimax 202 and Mega Image XS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Digimax 202MetricMega Image XS
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.02 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
16.17 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
6.18 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight115 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery3x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Digimax 202 and Mega Image XS have the same sensor area. The Mega Image XS has the lighter body. The Mega Image XS has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image XS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Mega Image XS
Released in 2006, Mega Image XS has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.